James Dyson is a visionary inventor, designer, educator, and founder of Dyson, a global company transforming ordinary household appliances into design and engineering marvels. He joins to discuss his iconic career, the role of failure in the creative process, and how good design can reshape the way we live.
James Dyson:
I’m a designer and an engineer. I’m not a money man or a manufacturer. I was making a product I loved. Strange to love vacuum cleaners, but I did and still do.
Curtis Fox:
From the TED Audio Collective, this is Design Matters with Debbie Millman. On Design Matters, Debbie talks with some of the most creative people in the world about what they do, how they got to be who they are, and what they’re thinking about and working on. On this episode, James Dyson talks about his life and some of the groundbreaking products he’s designed.
James Dyson:
I wasn’t aware that what I was doing was anything unusual or different. I was just doing it my way.
Debbie Millman:
My guest today is someone who has not only changed the way we clean our homes, but how we think about failure, invention, and even the air we breathe. Sir James Dyson is a British inventor, designer, entrepreneur, educator, and philanthropist. First known for inventing the world’s first bagless vacuum cleaner, James Dyson has built a global company that has reinvented how humans engage in and with technology. Sir James Dyson, welcome to Design Matters.
James Dyson:
Good morning.
Debbie Millman:
You have built a world-changing company on the belief that the best ideas come from frustration, failure, and relentless tinkering. You’ve transformed not just how we clean our homes, but how we think about design, engineering, and the very nature of invention. Sir James, my first question is this. What has mud taught you?
James Dyson:
Mud?
Debbie Millman:
Mud.
James Dyson:
Mud. Mud. Well, not a lot. I mean, I come across mud on my farms.
Debbie Millman:
Yes, I understand that when you walk, you get a lot of ideas and mud has helped inspire you with new thoughts about how things are made. We don’t have to answer that question. It just came up a lot and a lot of my research that you did.
James Dyson:
Oh, really?
Debbie Millman:
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
James Dyson:
Righto. Well, I used to slide around on it when I was a child in the creeks of Norfolk, and I guess it gets trodden into carpets and we have to clear it up, especially when it’s dry and we now clean it off hard floors with our hard-floor washing machine, which I can just see behind me, and it turns into dust and we have to deal with dust.
Debbie Millman:
We could skip that one. I just thought it would be fun to talk about because it came up a few times in my research.
James Dyson:
Oh, really?
Debbie Millman:
Mm-hmm. You grew up in Norfolk, a home where your family grew their own vegetables and collected eggs from your hens. There was no television, not enough heating, no new toys, and few, if any, consumer goods. Yet I read that your first memory is of being into a swimming pool by your father who was teaching you how to swim. What do you think it is about that experience that prompted such a visceral memory?
James Dyson:
Well, I was a very skinny little boy, and it was being done while the swimming pool was filling up, so it was filling up full of freezing water. Remember, this is Norfolk and there’s nothing between me and Norfolk and the Arctic in one direction and Siberia in the other. It was a pretty chilling experience. I remember that far more than the difficulties of learning to swim. I think I learned swimming very quickly just to get out of the water.
Debbie Millman:
Your dad has been described as a cheerful polymath who was also a keen photographer, he coached the rugby and hockey teams at your boarding school. He was also a teacher there of classics, and you and your older brother attended the school as well. And while at school you studied bassoon. You were part of the combined cadet force and acted in the school plays and designed the sets. You were also an athlete and began long-distance running. What first drew you to running?
James Dyson:
As a young child I never walked. I always ran everywhere because I think I was in a hurry. I didn’t see any point in walking because it seemed to be a waste of time, and I then discovered I’d rather enjoyed it. I don’t enjoy it now. I do it now. At the age of 78, I’m still running, but I don’t enjoy it now. But in those days it wasn’t such hard work, it wasn’t so painful, it seemed much more natural. I also liked it because I could get out into the countryside on my own, across the heathland and across the sand dunes, along the beaches. So it was a wonderful way to experience and feel the countryside.
Debbie Millman:
Do you think that the stamina required for long-distance running impacted how you approach the task of long-term invention?
James Dyson:
Completely. That I experienced during my youth that in order to be good at running, you have to run a lot and a lot of weightlifting and other things, and you must never give up. I think the thing I learned most from it peculiarly is running the mile.
Debbie Millman:
Why is that”
James Dyson:
Well, I was a long-distance runner and the mile was one of the… It was the longest distance we were allowed to run in those days. I think they thought running any further was bad for you. And what I learned was that the end of the third lap, when the finish isn’t quite in sight, you’re feeling the most tired and the most down, if you like, and I realized that was the time to accelerate because success is just around the corner, and people often give up at the point they’re about to be successful. When everything’s against you, everything you’ve tried doesn’t work, you’re feeling exhausted, it seems pointless. That’s the point to double down and really break through that last bit. That’s where everybody else gives up.
Debbie Millman:
Why do you think that is, just because of how difficult it feels at the time?
James Dyson:
Yes. Well, it does feel difficult and it feels that you not being successful, that you haven’t achieved what you set out to achieve and you’re a bit of a failure, and there doesn’t seem to be a solution to the problem. I mean, same in running, same in developing new technology. And that’s the very point where you mustn’t stop.
Debbie Millman:
Your father lost his battle to cancer when he was only 40 years old. You were nine. You said this about his passing, “Perhaps I had to learn quickly to make decisions for myself to be self-reliant and be willing to take risks. Little could be worse than my father dying when he did.” Yet you also wrote that you had to respond with a stiff upper lip. Why is that?
James Dyson:
Well, this was very shortly after the war and a lot of people had died in the war, and in Britain, there had always been up to that point the stiff upper lip of the upper classes and that you took disaster in your stride. You went away to boarding school away from your parents, you were often maltreated by the teachers. I don’t mean physically necessarily, but mentally, and you had to learn to survive that system. So death at that time was not considered the awful disaster that it is now. I mean, of course it was in a way, but nothing like how it is now. But I did feel different because I only had a mother, whereas everybody else at school had two parents for another reason actually, which was that divorces were far less frequent then. So everybody else seemed to have two parents and I only had one. So that made me feel different. I didn’t feel sorry for myself, but it made me feel different.
Debbie Millman:
How do you think that impacted how you ultimately have crafted the arc of your life?
James Dyson:
Oh, hugely, because as you said, I had to rely on myself. I thought I had to rely on myself. Although I had a very competent mother, a very loving mother, I somehow felt alone and I had to make my own decisions and find my own way in life. I didn’t have an awful lot to lose, so taking risks and living on the edge was something that came naturally to me.
Debbie Millman:
Before his death. Your father had been a teacher of classics at Gresham’s, a prestigious boarding school that you and your older brother also attended, and after he passed the school’s then headmaster, Logie Bruce Lockhart, allowed you to stay at this school despite not having the money to pay the tuition, and I believe Logie became a big influence on you while you were at school. Was he the first person to recommend you to consider furthering your education in product design?
James Dyson:
No, I think the school was very much against going into art as they called it then. You were supposed to go into the foreign office or be a doctor or an accountant or something. And I think indeed I was the first person from the school to go to a school of art and design when I left.
Debbie Millman:
Now, I don’t know if this is true or not, but I did read that he was okay about you going to art school because he didn’t think you had it academically in you to pursue anything else. Is that correct?
James Dyson:
Well, he is absolutely right.
Debbie Millman:
I mean, how did that make you feel at the time?
James Dyson:
Well, he was also… He was a polymath. I mean, admitted as a headmaster at the time that academia wasn’t everything. There were other things in life. I mean, he had been a very successful rugby player. He captained Scotland in rugby. He also was the first person to go into Belson as an army captain, young army captain. So he had quite a broad view of life that academia wasn’t the only thing.
Debbie Millman:
I read that you thought since you sat on chairs, you could be a furniture designer and quite liked the idea of constructing something useful.
James Dyson:
Well, that sounds incredibly arrogant, but you have to remember in the mid-’60s, design wasn’t the thing it is now. There weren’t shops where you could buy design. There weren’t design shops and the shops that existed were not interested in design. It was post-war, anything will do kind of set up. So I didn’t know about design and the wonderful principal of my college said, “What are you going to do next?” Because I did painting and drawing for a year, and he said, “There’s this thing called design. I think you might be quite good at design,” and I said, “What’s design?” It was that basic. And he reeled off a few types of design and furniture was the only one I recognized. So that’s what I chose to study. I actually switched to architecture while I was doing it.
Debbie Millman:
Do you remember when you first began to think about the world, not just as it is, but how it could be redesigned?
James Dyson:
Well, I was really lucky because the mid-’60s were a time of big cultural change, big technology change. Concorde was about to come out, the Mini car had been invented. There were lots of interesting things going on, and I got interested in that, which it’s quite surprising for an artist turned architect. I discovered that engineering was actually very interesting and it was the time of Norman Foster, Richard Rogers, Buckminster Fuller in particular. Buckminster Fuller just on the US exhibit at the Montreal Expo, which is this wonderful dome, complete dome made of aluminum tubes. It was the most wonderfully inspiring exhibit. And I suddenly realized that architecture and products of that matter were really about their engineering, not the style, not the outward appearance of them, and I realized that I wanted to do… Which is a bit odd, I was a designer and would-be architect. I wanted to do the engineering, the technology as well as design it, and most arrogantly, also wanted to make it, and I don’t know what gave me that.
Debbie Millman:
Why do you think that’s arrogance?
James Dyson:
Well, there I was at the Royal College of Art in London, a school of art and design, imagining I could be a manufacturer and sell my products to the world. I mean, that is a huge form of arrogance.
Debbie Millman:
You attended structural engineering classes with Anthony Hunt, the designer of London’s Waterloo Station. What did he teach you about the relationship between design and engineering and integrity?
James Dyson:
Well, we had blackboards in those days and used to draw structural problems on the blackboard, and I found it riveting why a bridge stayed up and why bridges fell down, how cable structures worked. The structure is at the heart of everything and engineering is at the heart of everything, and that’s where you start. That’s what it taught me.
Debbie Millman:
Yeah. My father-in-law is an engineer and he’s astounded at how little design really appreciates in engineering and what it really takes to bring an idea to life.
James Dyson:
Well, yes. I mean, Tony drew and was a normal human being, and I didn’t realize that engineers were like that. I thought they were very boring people in white coats, and suddenly I realized how wrong I’d been. And society then did divide people into the backroom boys with the white coats and the designers out front with the pink shirts and the felt-tip pens. I mean, it’s a stale analogy, but the world was divided like that, and I didn’t think that was right.
Debbie Millman:
How did your experience of studying art and design affect the way you eventually approached engineering?
James Dyson:
Well, my structural engineers tutor who introduced me to Buckminster Fuller, through that, I realized that you start with how the product works, the new technology it uses and why it’s therefore a better product or a better building for that matter, and that the design should evolve from how the product works or what it’s used for, how you use it, not the sort of Harvey Earl skin that the Buckminster department uses to help sell the product in a contemporary style. So I was sort of revolted by that and wanted to know what the product’s going to look like as you develop the engineering because of the way it works.
Debbie Millman:
Do you find that most people find that design and engineering are complementary or intention?
James Dyson:
Well, strange enough, shortly after I left college, I went back as an examiner and then as a governor. We started in the Royal College probably the first engineering design course in the world, melding design and engineering, and that started a trend, and I think most colleges now teach engineering with design, thank goodness.
Debbie Millman:
Yes. Your first commercial invention was the ballbarrow, a wheelbarrow with a ball instead of a wheel. Where did that inspiration come from and what did that experience teach you about innovation and resistance?
James Dyson:
Well, my first product was actually a high-speed landing craft, which I did for a public company. I did that straight from-
Debbie Millman:
That was a sea vessel, is that correct?
James Dyson:
Yes, it was a high-speed landing craft, and I did that actually while I was still at university at the Royal College of Art, and then went to set up the company to manufacture and sell it around the world. And I then want to do my own product for humans. I mean, as opposed to armies and construction companies and oil companies, which was what my landing craft was used for. So I wanted to do something for the home. And I had been doing other house, an old house in the Cotswolds, and the wheelbarrow kept getting stuck in the mud. It had a narrow whee.
Debbie Millman:
Mud.
James Dyson:
That’s mud again. Yeah, it’s all back to mud. And the legs, the little tubular legs that get sunk in and the thing would tip over and whatever you put in it fell out. So just while I was lugging this thing around, I started to redesign it in my head, and the first obvious thing was to have a balloon fat tire, not this narrow tire that they have, and then it started from there. Frustration.
Debbie Millman:
Frustration. Envisioning something better.
James Dyson:
Yes, yes. Wanting to do something better.
Debbie Millman:
While spray-painting the ballbarrow, you initially used a standard fan to keep removing the flying paint particles, but it kept clogging and stopping the production line, and you discovered that cyclone separators were the only thing that could do the job, and that discovery led to your reinvention of the entire vacuum cleaner category. And in the years leading up to its public introduction, you famously made 5,127 prototypes of the vacuum over five years before arriving at one that worked, and that number has become part of the Dyson mythology. Was there ever a time in the journey to 5,127 that you wanted to give up?
James Dyson:
Well, of course. It’s like running the mile again, so I’m back to that. Yeah. I mean, I don’t know. When I got to the 4000th prototype, I wonder, “Is this ever going to end?”
Debbie Millman:
Did any specific prototype ever just break you?
James Dyson:
Well, none of them worked, but I was understanding more and more and certainly finding out what didn’t work, and one of the reasons I built so many prototypes, and one of the reasons we still do today is that you can only make one change at a time. So a lot of people want to be brilliant and leap to the final answer, but you start and you make one change at a time, and you wait to see what difference that change makes, and sometimes it makes it better and sometimes it makes it worse, and then you wonder why, and that tells you what to do for the next prototype and the next prototype and so on. So you’re making slow progress, you’re learning, and you’re taking often one step back, one step forward, and so on. So many of the days are wasted, but you rule things out.
Debbie Millman:
So it’s like a control?
James Dyson:
Yes, and you’re narrowing the field and you’re getting close to the solution. I mean, the particular problem I had was that, well, first of all, I was told by the highest authority in Britain on cyclones that you can never make a cyclone that will clear cigarette smoke. You can only collect sand in it, gritty sand, not cigarette smoke. So part of my research was proving him wrong about that. I rather like proving experts wrong.
Debbie Millman:
It’s very satisfying, isn’t it?
James Dyson:
And then the other problem was, which is actually a far greater problem in the end, was that a cyclone is for clearing very fine particles, but vacuum cleaners pick up lots of nasty things, like scissors and coins and hair in particular, fluff and hair, and cyclones don’t like fluff and hair.
Debbie Millman:
Because they’re too big?
James Dyson:
It goes straight through it, because it is only for clearing fine dust. So I had to solve that problem and that was probably the most difficult one, and that’s one where I most nearly gave up.
Debbie Millman:
You went into debt in this journey. You even had the house you lived in with your family on the line. What kept you going? Were you that sure that you could produce something that would ultimately become what it became?
James Dyson:
No, I wasn’t sure at all, and I was beginning to doubt myself more and more as I couldn’t find a solution, but I was in debt and I had to carry on, and my wife is hugely supportive. She’s an artist and she understands what a project is, but nevertheless, it’s a big thing to put the house on, and especially when you’ve got three young children and a dog.
Debbie Millman:
Was there an emotional difference between the first failure and the 5000th?
James Dyson:
The 5127th?
Debbie Millman:
Well, not really, because by 5,127, you’re on the verge of success, whereas 5,000, you’re still not sure how many more iterations you’ll need to be successful or if you’ll be successful. Does it get easier? Does resilience get easier with repetition?
James Dyson:
I don’t think so, no. I mean, it is interesting because you’ve done these experiments, you’ve failed and you’ve had some successes, and it’s a fascinating time actually. It may not sound it from outside, but when you’re doing it, when you’re making these discoveries yourself, it’s very absorbing. I mean, I was working at home at the time and I used to come in for lunch covered with dust and sit down, and I was happy actually, heavily in debt and worried, deeply worried of course, but at the same time, professionally, at least very happy.
Debbie Millman:
Are you afraid of failure?
James Dyson:
Well, yes. I mean, everyone’s afraid of failure, but it’s a necessary part of experimenting and ultimately succeeding. And I’m always very disappointed that school wants you to get the answer, or academia wants you to get the answer right immediately.
Debbie Millman:
Well, I think we’re living in a world now where there’s this almost requirement for immediate gratification, immediate success. People that are successful early in their lives are lauded, and there seems to be a lack of real patience and rigor in the way most people approach the world these days.
James Dyson:
Well, I mean, in almost any job you do, you don’t know the answer. You have to work it out. But that’s not what school teaches you to. School teaches you to learn something, remember it, and then spout it when asked. It doesn’t teach you about failure. I mean, I always think that school should mark people not on the number of right answers they give, but the number of wrong answers, which they then go away and experiment and correct for themselves and find out for themselves viscerally, because that’s what life’s about. And I’ve looked at the people I was at school with who were very keen on getting top marks and coming top and all that kind of thing, and they haven’t always had very interesting lives afterwards, whereas the failures, a lot of academic failures have had a much more interesting and exciting life.
Debbie Millman:
As a teacher. I am going to borrow that phrase and encourage my students to ask as many questions as they can that might be giving them the wrong answers to get to the right one.
James Dyson:
And also work things out for themselves, get to the answer by failing no. Well, there is a hurry to get the right answer, but getting the wrong answer and then understanding why they failed and working out the right answer is what life is about.
Debbie Millman:
You founded Dyson Limited in 1991 and launched the DC01 in 1993. What were the early days of Dyson Limited like?
James Dyson:
Pretty scary. I didn’t have any money for a start. And it was interesting, a lot of people put money into start-ups, so start-ups are quite well-funded. I didn’t have any money, so I had to make do without money. I couldn’t advertise or do any PR or anything. It’s a very good process to go through so that you work out how to do things the hard way without just spending money. So for example, the first retailer who was… Because they all rejected me at the beginning because I wasn’t a brand. You can’t sell an electrical product unless you’re a brand.
Debbie Millman:
Yeah, once you get to that 5127th prototype that works, then you have everybody saying, “No, I don’t want this.”
James Dyson:
Yeah, they absolutely said that. I got one person who was vaguely interested, an electrical retailer, and he said, “Well, I’ve taken it home, and everything you say about it’s true, but why would anyone buy a Dyson in a shop? They’re going to buy a brand name, wouldn’t buy you. What about doing some advertising?” I said, “I haven’t got any money.” He said, “Well, I can’t take you then,” and then I said, “Well, supposing every thousand machines you order, I’ll spend 10,000 pounds or whatever it was on television advertising,” and we did a deal on that basis, and that really got me going.
Debbie Millman:
And you were featured in the ads?
James Dyson:
No, not originally. No, I did that later.
Debbie Millman:
Okay. One of the things that-
James Dyson:
That wasn’t my idea, by the way.
Debbie Millman:
Oh, I know. I know.
James Dyson:
I thought it’s a very embarrassing thing to do.
Debbie Millman:
I think they’re charming. Absolutely charming. One of the things that I was so fascinated by-
James Dyson:
My family was horrified when they saw what I was doing.
Debbie Millman:
Why?
James Dyson:
I don’t know, I think they thought it was some terrible form of salesmanship. In Britain, we’re quite snobby about selling. It’s not a profession that’s well-respected at all. It’s very different in the United States quite correctly. It’s a wonderful thing to do, actually. A very exciting job.
Debbie Millman:
It is a very exciting job. In 1995, I joined a firm that had originated in the UK, Sterling Brands, and I came in as their salesperson, their business development person, and I was working with an entire team of British men, and I think they hated me at first because I was so overtly-
James Dyson:
I’m sure they didn’t. I’m sure. Oh, because you were keen on selling?
Debbie Millman:
I was keen. I was like this weird American woman that was out there selling, and they were horrified.
James Dyson:
Well, I hope you showed them the way.
Debbie Millman:
I did actually. That was very gratifying. One of the biggest resistances to the acceptance of your vacuum cleaner by the industry was the fact that it didn’t have a bag even though that was one of the great, great differentiators, because people were concerned that it would change the vacuum cleaner bag industry, and therefore the people that were making the bags wouldn’t be making money anymore, and that just blew my mind that-
James Dyson:
Well, it was two things actually. One is that the vacuum cleaner manufacturers would have no further sales, like the razor blade, and the shops were worried that they too would have no further sales of bags, and they liked selling bags because people had to come into the shop to buy them, so it brought them into the shop, which was a good idea. So yes, there was a no bag resistance. In fact, the term bagless wasn’t coined by me. It was coined by my competitors who wanted to make it sound bad. So bagless was a derogatory term.
Debbie Millman:
I can’t even begin to tell you how many times over the decades prior to your vacuum cleaner coming out, I would cease to be able to use my vacuum cleaner because I had issues getting the bags, and so it just sat in the closet, dormant, while dirt piled up on the carpet.
James Dyson:
It’s a horrifying story. Well, actually that’s how I started because the vacuum cleaner wasn’t working, and I thought, “Oh, the bag must be full,” but I couldn’t find a spare one. So I went and tipped the contents out into a garbage can and gaffer taped it, scotch tape the end back up again. I put it back in the machine and still it wasn’t picking things up. So I thought, “Well, that’s odd. The vacuum bag is empty, why isn’t it…” So I took my scotch tape off and looked inside the bag and there was a lining of fine dust all the way around the inside of the bag, and then the penny dropped. What’s happening here is that the air is supposed to go through the bag and it’s being clogged by fine dust particles. So it’s a con. The bag wasn’t full, the bag was clogged. We need a better system.
Debbie Millman:
At what point did you realize that you weren’t just making vacuums, that you were creating an entirely new category and a new design language?
James Dyson:
Well, I don’t think there was a point where I thought that. I mean, I am a designer and an engineer. I’m not a money man or a manufacturer. I was making a product I loved. Strange to love vacuum cleaners, but I did and still do, and that’s what I was doing. So I wasn’t aware that what I was doing was ending unusual or different. I was just doing it my way.
Debbie Millman:
You’ve said that design is not about making things look pretty, it’s about solving problems. Yet I’m sitting in your studio in Soho, New York City, surrounded by the most beautiful products in your categories that you sell in existence. So talk about, if you can, the connection between your visual aesthetic and your innovation that’s inherent in every product that you’ve brought to market.
James Dyson:
Well, I think it goes back to the time I was at the Royal College of Art and Design, that’s where I come from, and then wanting to understand engineering and designing engineering products. I mean, Buckminster Fuller led me to it, but being asked to design a high-speed landing craft, which I’d hardly been on a boat before, let alone design one. And the boat had to work. I mean, it had to float, it had to be unsinkable, and it had to go fast and it had to land on beaches and all that sort of thing. So it is how it performed. Its performance, how you use it, what it’s like to use, how it looks certainly, does it look purposeful? Most people thought it didn’t look like a boat and it didn’t look like a conventional boat, it was this own version of a boat, but it explained its use when you looked at it.
I didn’t see the difference between engineering and design. For me, they were one thing. And I hate the idea that an engineer designed and develops technology and then someone comes along and makes it look good. I just don’t like that approach.
Debbie Millman:
Has a need for a specific aesthetic in your work ever needed to be sacrificed because of an engineering need?
James Dyson:
Oh, yes. Often you can’t do what you want to do visually because of an engineering issue, but that’s fine. You’ve got to work with those constraints.
Debbie Millman:
In my research, I came upon numerous instances where you were dismissive of market research, and I read one interview wherein you stated most focus groups are wrong. Do you still believe that, and if so, why?
James Dyson:
Well, let’s put it this way. They’re dodgy. They can tell you some things, but they really can’t give you the answers, and I always say that proof of that is that politicians rely on them. So if you want an example of why they don’t work. I’ll give you a very simple good example. When we were developing cyclonic action for a vacuum cleaner, we made all the parts see-through so you could see what was going on, and you could see the dirt piling up in the collection bin, and we thought that was rather nice. There was something very pleasing about it.
Debbie Millman:
Really satisfying about this. It’s evidence.
James Dyson:
So I made the early prototypes with clear bins, and when we showed them to retailers, they said, “You can’t sell that thing. People don’t want to see the dirt. It’s disgusting.” But we decided to persevere because we thought it was right, and we did some market research, and the retailers were absolutely right, people didn’t want to see the dirt, and our competitors-
Debbie Millman:
Well, they said they didn’t, right?
James Dyson:
I think they didn’t want to see it, because it’s disgusting. I mean-
Debbie Millman:
It’s sort of horrifying to see what humans produce.
James Dyson:
Yeah. Well, yes, and dogs and the world. But we were just convinced that it was interesting and satisfying because when you push around a cleaner, a bag vacuum cleaner, you don’t know what you’re doing. I mean, you’re pushing it around, it’s making a screaming noise and you hope you’re cleaning, maybe you could see some of the dirt coming off the surface. We don’t know deep down what’s going on. So we ignored it, we ignored the retailers and our competitors laughed when they saw it in the store, but it was something that people really liked because at last they got… Pleasure is the wrong word. But they got some satisfaction for the half an hour, an hour they spent vacuuming their home because they had collected that dirt out of the house.
Debbie Millman:
You made 5,127 prototypes before you launched your vacuum cleaner. There are a couple of products that you’ve designed that haven’t been as successful in the market, or you chose not to continue selling them, the electric vehicle and your washing machine, although it does seem like your washing machine really… There’s a moment in time where it could be relaunched, at least from everything I’ve read about how great it is. Talk about the decisions to not bring something to market or to remove something from the market.
James Dyson:
That we should have carried on with the washing machine. At the time, it was very expensive to make, probably three times the cost of a normal washing machine, and we didn’t charge enough for it, and so it was losing money and we should have persevered, because actually, it was selling quite well and people who bought it really liked it, but we weren’t very big in those days, and losing money is not something you want to do as a private business. Now, the car was a very different matter. We started developing that in 2014 when Tesla was the only other person doing electric cars. I looked at what the industry was predicting, and it said that 2% of cars by 2030 would be electric, and I thought that was wrong. And we were developing electric motors, still developing electric motors. We are developing battery technology and we’re about cleaning air and moving air and chilling air, and so on.
So I thought that we were in quite a good position to do an electric car, but every manufacturer had started making electric cars, but losing a lot of money on them, which they were prepared to do. Now, we couldn’t compete in that environment because we had to make money out of our car. We couldn’t offset our losses on the electric car by continuing to make gas guzzlers at the other end. So it was entirely a commercial decision. Car business is a big business. You need a lot of money and a lot of capital, and we’re a private business, a relatively small private business.
Debbie Millman:
You’ve been a private company since 1991. You are the sole owner. Talk about the decision to keep it private.
James Dyson:
Well, that wasn’t difficult. I mean, I own all the shares because no one would back it. I did try to get people to back it, but no one would back it. They said, “You’re an engineer and we’re not backing engineers. We want commercial people.” So by default, I own 100% of the shares and I don’t really want to sell any shares to anybody. I want it to remain a family business, a private family business whose sole interest is in producing new technology and developing new products and not be constrained by short-termism and having to make an immediate profit.
Debbie Millman:
The air blade hand dryer, the bladeless air multiplier fan, the supersonic hair dryer, these aren’t just technological household gadgets, they’re game-changers, but innovation is really expensive. What is your philosophy on risk and return, especially when the outcome is uncertain and you are the person that’s funding everything?
James Dyson:
Of course, we have to look at things commercially, but you have to take risks and you don’t know. And when we introduced the the hair dryer, well, and for that matter, the hand dryer, we didn’t know we’d sell any. You never know how many you’re going to sell. So everything is a huge risk. As I said, I think from the early age, I didn’t mind living on the edge. I’d lost everything and lost my father, not my mother, a loving mother, but I wasn’t afraid of losing things.
Debbie Millman:
Mm-hmm. In 2016, you founded the Dyson Institute of Engineering and Technology that is now a university and offers degrees while students work on real products. You also created the James Dyson Foundation, which supports design education. What do you think is missing from how we teach engineering and creativity to young people today?
James Dyson:
Well, we have a thing called the James Dyson Award, which is now in, I don’t know, 35 countries, I think, where we asked people to solve a problem. Young people, these people at university. And one of the interesting things is that in the beginning, 20 years ago, they designed windsurfers and sort of sporting things, but now they’ve fallen into two categories only. One is things that improve the health, particularly an ability of old people, or environmental projects, improve environment. And there were some wonderful, wonderful examples of both of those. For example, there’s a Philippine student who discovered there’s a lot of rotting fruit happens in the Philippines because of hurricanes and so on, and he discovered that a mixture of certain rotting fruit, if you formed a paste from it and put it over a window as a sort of film, a green film, it created electricity from light, not sunshine, but light. And he showed me a pane of glass, like a television screen, and he was charging his iPad from it.
So that was utterly brilliant. And then a much simpler example was a woman in Ireland, student in Ireland whose mother had had cancer and lost her hair, and she designed… There weren’t enough freezing things in the hospital to freeze your head. So she designed a portable one where you put on something that looked like quite a stylish hat actually with some tubes that went down to a cooling device in a handbag that you hang on your shoulder so that you could cool your head if you had cancer, you cool your head anywhere actually, in the car, traveling, or at home. The thing I find interesting about this is it’s wonderful that young people are thinking of those things and coming up with those solutions. Rather than talking about problems, they’re actually solving them. So that’s why I have huge faith in young people.
Debbie Millman:
There seems to be a big difference between coming up with an idea where you see a problem, so hair falls out when you undertake chemotherapy, but the paste on the window, how does something like that manifest in somebody’s mind? I think I’m just going to take the paste from these decaying fruit, smear it on a window and see what happens.
James Dyson:
Yeah, he was rather an interesting person actually, because he had entered our award two years earlier and not won it. So he carried on. He kept trying and trying again, experimenting, and then he won our global award. I mean, every year I’m just amazed at how people take intractable problems and solve them for the good of the world. They’re not skateboards or something fancy, they’re really trying to solve serious problems.
Debbie Millman:
James, they had have one last question for you. If there was something you could invent tomorrow that would be instantly successful, anything at all, what would that be?
James Dyson:
Well, you can’t think of things like that, so I’m not going to give an answer to that, because you don’t know something’s going to be successful until you do it, and isn’t always successful. Sometimes it’s not. And I’m not sure. In a way, you shouldn’t think of life in those terms because you should do what you want to do. That’s something you have a passion for, and sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t. But success or financial success isn’t the only measure of success.
Debbie Millman:
What is the most important aspect of success to you?
James Dyson:
Solving a problem and making something out of it. And it can be a big thing, it can be a small thing. It doesn’t matter, but well, maybe it does matter to some people, but either way, you’ve achieved something, you’ve changed in a very small way, the world. It’s your achievement, and that’s what you were there to do, make a difference.
Debbie Millman:
Sir James Dyson, thank you so much for making so much work that matters, and thank you for joining me today on Design Matters.
James Dyson:
Well, I enjoyed talking to you. Thank you very much.
Debbie Millman:
Thank you. To learn more about the great work of Sir Dyson, you can go to dyson.com or jamesdysonfoundation.com. This is the 20th year we’ve been podcasting Design Matters, and I’d like to thank you for listening. And remember, we can talk about making a difference, we can make a difference, or we can do both. I’m Debbie Millman and I look forward to talking with you again soon.
Curtis Fox:
Design Matters is produced for the TED Audio Collective by Curtis Fox Productions. The interviews are usually recorded at the Masters in Branding program at the School of Visual Arts in New York City, the first and longest running branding program in the world. The editor-in-chief of Design Matters Media is Emily Weiland.
